Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Yaniv

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2019 July 26.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete and Salt. --MelanieN (talk) 01:15, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Yaniv

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been created a number of times:

02:22, June 12, 2008 by Jyaniv (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
03:38, August 26, 2014 by Tn blogs (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
01:23, September 9, 2014 by TechJournalistInfo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

It would be reasonable to presume that a notable person involved with a notable technology news network would have at least some significant online third-party coverage, aside from directories and so on. While the "TrustedNerd.com" website does exist and its creator is a real person, I can find no significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject about either the website or the person. Shirt58 (talk) 09:05, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 09:57, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 09:58, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Yaniv is a very well known Canadian journalist on the west coast of Canada who has hundreds of thousands of Twitter followers @trustednerd. I don't agree with this AFD at all. 184.65.101.209 (talk)

Comment Subject does not seem to have any journalist credentials, nor is he affiliated with, or mentioned by, any publication other than his own blog. Twitter followers have little bearing on whether or not a person is notable by Wikipedia guidelines, and the follower history on the @trustednerd account is suspicious. Leaving as "comment" since I initiated the AfD Tophitch (talk) 04:31, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The independent coverage required for notability has not been found. The Twitter feed reads like a string of adverts, and no basis appears to exist for attributing any credibility to these "reviews": Noyster (talk), 11:14, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:41, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I see no evidence of passing notability standards. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:10, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete This guy seems to be creating his own page every time it gets deleted. His social media followers seem to be purchased and the Alexa ranking on his website indicates very little traffic at all. Looks like his online presence exists largely to obtain demo products from tech companies. 206.108.31.36 (talk) 08:25, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.